There’s a new book out called “Camelot and the Cultural Revolution,” by Jim Piereson. Rich Lowry summarizes its arguments in a column today: Killing Camelot.

[President Kennedy's assassination] represented more than the tragic death of a young president, but the descent of liberalism from an optimistic creed focused on pragmatic improvements in the American condition to a darker philosophy obsessed with America’s sins. Echoes of the assassination – and the meaning attributed to it by JFK’s admirers – can still be heard in the querulous tones of contemporary liberalism.

The real John F. Kennedy wasn’t the paladin of liberal purity of myth. He was friends with Joseph McCarthy. In his 1952 campaign for Senate and his 1960 presidential campaign, he got to the right of his Republican opponents on key issues. “Kennedy did not want anyone to tag him as a liberal, which he regarded as the kiss of death in electoral politics,” Piereson writes. As president, he was vigorously anti-communist, a tax-cutter and a cautious supporter of civil rights.

His kind of liberalism – “tough and realistic,” as Piereson puts it, in the tradition of FDR and Truman – was carried away in the riptide of his death. In a crucial and counterintuitive interpretive act, the nation’s opinion elite made JFK a martyr to civil rights instead of the Cold War. Kennedy had been killed by a communist, Lee Harvey Oswald, who a few years before had tried to defect to the Soviet Union.

Liberals nonetheless blamed the assassination on, in the characteristic words of Supreme Court Chief Justice Earl Warren, “the hatred and bitterness that has been injected into the life of our nation by bigots.”

Thus, the assassination curdled into an indictment of American society: “Kennedy Victim of Violent Streak He Sought to Curb in Nation,” read a New York Times headline. Until this point, 20th-century liberalism had tended to see history as a steady march of progress. Now, the march had been interrupted by the country’s own pathologies. “Kennedy was mourned in a spirit of frustrated possibility and dashed hopes,” Piereson argues, and that sense of loss came to define the new liberalism.

American history no longer appeared to be a benign process, but a twisted story of rapine and oppression. “With such a bill of indictment,” Piereson writes, “the new liberals now held that Americans had no good reason to feel pride in their country’s past or optimism about its future.”

...................
Share this!

Posts which might be related to this one based on a mysterious algorithm:

• People Are Crazy and Times Are Strange
• Morgan Freeman on “Black History Month”
• And MORE on what Bob Dylan said in Minnesota on election night