From the Washington Post comes this stunning headline: Joan Baez Unwelcome At Concert For Troops.

When rocker John Mellencamp performed for the recovering soldiers at Walter Reed Army Medical Center on Friday night, a couple of things were missing. He squelched his typically blistering rhetoric against the war in Iraq. Also MIA, as it turned out, was folkie and antiwar activist Joan Baez, who says she was disinvited from the event by Army officials.

In a letter that appears today in The Washington Post, Baez says Mellencamp had wanted her to perform with him and that she had accepted his invitation.

“I have stood as firmly against the Iraq War as I did the Vietnam War 40 years ago,” Baez writes.

“I have always been an advocate for nonviolence,” she writes, “and I have stood as firmly against the Iraq war as I did the Vietnam War 40 years ago. . . . I realize now that I might have contributed to a better welcome home for those soldiers fresh from Vietnam. Maybe that’s why I didn’t hesitate to accept the invitation to sing for those returning from Iraq and Afghanistan.

“In the end, four days before the concert, I was not ‘approved’ by the Army to take part. Strange irony.”

I fail to see any irony, frankly, but maybe Joan doesn’t define that word like I do. What I do see is a rather amazing level of disingenuousness on Baez’s part. Are we really to believe her intent was to “welcome home” these soldiers? Wasn’t she intead going in order to convey the message that the cause they fought for was unjust?

Baez, who said Mellencamp had asked her to sing two songs with him, has been an avowed anti-violence activist ever since she refused to participate in an air raid drill at her Southern California high school. In the ’60s, her name became synonymous with the antiwar movement, though many of the protest songs she was famous for performing, such as “Blowin’ in the Wind,” were covers of Bob Dylan and Pete Seeger songs. In 1964 she protested the Vietnam War by refusing to pay 60 percent of her income taxes. In 1968, she married activist David Harris — the two met in jail following a protest — and moved with him into his draft resistance commune.

This all can’t help but remind me of Dylan’s comment on this subject, in his Playboy interview with Nat Hentoff, published in 1966:

PLAYBOY: How do you feel about those who have risked imprisonment by burning their draft cards to signify their opposition to U. S. involvement in Vietnam, and by refusing – as your friend Joan Baez has done – to pay their income taxes as a protest against the Covernment’s expenditures on war and weaponry? Do you think they’re wasting their time?

DYLAN: Burning draft cards isn’t going to end any war. It’s not even going to save any lives. If someone can feel more honest with himself by burning his draft card, then that’s great; but if he’s just going to feel more important because he does it, then that’s a drag. I really don’t know too much about Joan Baez and her income-tax problems. The only thing I can tell you about Joan Baez is that she’s not Belle Starr.

Back to the Washington Post story:

After the concert, Baez said, Mellencamp left her a message to say, “I hope you’re not mad at me.” Her response: ” ‘Of course not. It’s an honor to be turned down by the Army.’ . . . But I would have been happier getting in . . . I thought times had changed enough.”

Oh boy, poor Joan. Still waiting for the times to change! Just one of the many Bob Dylan songs she never understood.

The line it is drawn
The curse it is cast
The slow one now
Will later be fast
As the present now
Will later be past
The order is
Rapidly fadin’.
And the first one now
Will later be last
For the times they are a-changin’.

...................
Share this!

Posts which might be related to this one based on a mysterious algorithm:

• Worthy of note: On Bob Dylan, Vietnam and the conventional wisdom
• Weekly Standard, Oct. 2
• A gig in Russia