Amazon.com Widgets RightWingBob.com » 2007 » April

 


You are in the RightWingBob.com archive.



Advertisements


RightWingBob.com
Another side of Bob and more!

The tempest may howl and the loud thunder roar
And gathering storms may arise
But calm is my feeling, at rest is my soul
The tears are all wiped from my eyes



 


Monday, April 23, 2007

“There was nothing we could do” ...9:49 am

Despite the truly obscene rush by NBC to put Cho Seung-Hui’s “manifesto” in the public domain, supposedly so that we could better understand why he came to commit such horrific acts, the truth is that no one is going to be able to “understand” why he did it, other than those who, in their own illness, will latch on to his example just as he latched on to the Columbine killers.

The issue is one of mental health, and that subject is pursued in a column today by E. Fuller Torrey, M.D., who has long campaigned for revised laws and adequate treatment to help those seriously mentally ill persons who are incapable of seeking out and consenting to treatment on their own.

A common denominator in about half of all rampage killings is that the killer has a severe psychiatric disorder that is not being treated. This was almost certainly the case with Cho Seung-Hui, who exhibited classic symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia. He was ordered by a judge to have a psychiatric evaluation in December 2005, and even ordered to get treatment. But our mental-health-care system is more disorganized than the minds of the sickest patients, so, as commonly happens, there was no follow-up and no treatment.

Like Cho, most mentally ill rampage killers are known to the mental-health system. Sylvia Seegrist, for example, had been hospitalized for schizophrenia 12 times, had tried to kill her mother and had even stabbed her psychologist, yet she was receiving no treatment at the time of the killings. A study of 102 rampage killings carried out between 1949 and 1999 strongly suggests that these episodes are occurring increasingly frequently in recent years.

And why shouldn’t they be? We emptied the state psychiatric hospitals but did not ensure that those who need continuing treatment get it. Most mentally ill people are not dangerous but a small subset of them are. And they tend to be individuals like Cho, who think people are doing things to them and have other paranoid ideas. Studies suggest that such people are responsible for about 5 percent of all homicides in the United States - almost 1,000 a year - but approximately 50 percent of rampage killings.

A fundamental problem is that our state laws are written in a way that makes it exceedingly difficult to involuntarily treat someone until they have demonstrated dangerousness. Virginia, for one, requires that someone be “imminently” dangerous before they can be involuntarily treated. In effect, that means that you have to be either trying to kill your psychiatrist or trying to kill yourself in front of your psychiatrist. The students and faculty at Virginia Tech correctly identified Cho as being very disturbed and potentially dangerous but that only resulted in a virtually universal refrain: “There was nothing we could do.”

We know all too well that changing the laws is just the first step. In fact, even when the law is clear, the people implementing it are often ignorant of it or simply ignore it. Take, for instance, Virginia’s outpatient-commitment law that the judge used for Cho.

The state’s law says the local mental-health agency shall monitor the person’s compliance with treatment. And yet, when asked, a spokeman for the agency that should have helped Cho said, “The matter of the individual actually following up and going to that appointment is his or her prerogative.” Not just untrue, but ridiculous. He also said that the court order “can’t actually be enforced,” despite the fact that the law says that upon failure to adhere to the treatment order, the judge can rescind it and order hospitalization.

The answer, of course, is to change state laws so clearly psychotic individuals who are exhibiting signs of dangerousness can be hospitalized and treated before they kill, not merely after - and then to make sure those laws are used. The Treatment Advocacy Center (treatmentadvocacycenter.org) has a model statute that permits treatment when needed but, at the same time, protects individuals’ civil rights so that the law should not be abused.

Until we correct such laws, episodes such as we observed this week will continue to occur with shocking regularity. They don’t have to happen.

...................
Share this!
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [StumbleUpon] [Email]

Posts which might be related to this one based on a mysterious algorithm:




Sunday, April 22, 2007

In the balance ...1:59 pm

From Rome in 2003, here is Bob Dylan performing his 1981 song Every Grain of Sand. Click here to go to directly to YouTube or view the embedded version below.

As many were no doubt reminded in sermons this morning, it’s hard in the merciless world in which we live to really retain confidence that every hair is numbered, and that the Master’s hand both moves and stills each leaf that trembles. The “bitter dance of loneliness” and the “broken mirror of innocence,” on the other hand — those things are easy enough to see and to feel. But those who struggle to be believers have to struggle also not to turn a deaf or cynical ear to the reassurances we daily receive that we are not alone and not abandoned, and that the God who hears the cries of the anguished will one day wipe away each tear, and that, in some way which remains a mystery to us today, has already set things right for all eternity. Those reassurances come in an endless variety of ways, and one of them, to be sure, could be by hearing a song as sublime as this one, given to a poor human being to sing.

I hear the ancient footsteps like the motion of the sea
Sometimes I turn, there’s someone there, other times it’s only me.
I am hanging in the balance of a perfect finished plan
Like every sparrow falling, like every grain of sand.

...................
Share this!
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [StumbleUpon] [Email]

Posts which might be related to this one based on a mysterious algorithm:




Friday, April 20, 2007

Engaged ...9:14 pm

Actor and former senator Fred Thompson writes in National Review Online on gun rights, in the aftermath of the Virginia Tech massacre.

Virginia, like 39 other states, allows citizens with training and legal permits to carry concealed weapons. That means that Virginians regularly sit in movie theaters and eat in restaurants among armed citizens. They walk, joke, and rub shoulders everyday with people who responsibly carry firearms — and are far safer than they would be in San Francisco, Oakland, Detroit, Chicago, New York City, or Washington, D.C., where such permits are difficult or impossible to obtain.

The statistics are clear. Communities that recognize and grant Second Amendment rights to responsible adults have a significantly lower incidence of violent crime than those that do not. More to the point, incarcerated criminals tell criminologists that they consider local gun laws when they decide what sort of crime they will commit, and where they will do so.

Still, there are a lot of people who are just offended by the notion that people can carry guns around. They view everybody, or at least many of us, as potential murderers prevented only by the lack of a convenient weapon. Virginia Tech administrators overrode Virginia state law and threatened to expel or fire anybody who brings a weapon onto campus.

[...]

The logic behind this attitude baffles me, but I suspect it has to do with a basic difference in worldviews. Some people think that power should exist only at the top, and everybody else should rely on “the authorities” for protection.

Despite such attitudes, average Americans have always made up the front line against crime. Through programs like Neighborhood Watch and Amber Alert, we are stopping and catching criminals daily. Normal people tackled “shoe bomber” Richard Reid as he was trying to blow up an airliner. It was a truck driver who found the D.C. snipers. Statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show that civilians use firearms to prevent at least a half million crimes annually.

[...]

Whenever I’ve seen one of those “Gun-free Zone” signs, especially outside of a school filled with our youngest and most vulnerable citizens, I’ve always wondered exactly who these signs are directed at. Obviously, they don’t mean much to the sort of man who murdered 32 people just a few days ago.

...................
Share this!
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [StumbleUpon] [Email]

Posts which might be related to this one based on a mysterious algorithm:




New interview with Dylan at Rolling Stone ...6:48 pm

They call it “Bob Dylan Like You’ve Never Heard Him Before.” There are five audio clips at that link of Bob talking to Jann Wenner, as part of a series of interviews with various stars to mark the occasion of Rolling Stone’s 40th anniversary. They seem to be in a hotel room while Dylan is on tour somewhere — there’s no specific date given. Dylan is in fine form, pretty hilarious at times, turning questions back on Wenner just like the old days, but doing it all with enormous good humor. Wenner seems out of his depth a lot of the time, and nowhere more so than when he attempts to ask Dylan the big “religion question.” Dylan distinguishes between religion and faith, and it’s something Wenner doesn’t seem to be able to fathom, let alone probe meaningfully. And I get the impression that that’s just fine by Bob.


Addendum:
More on this subject later, but in terms of Bob’s remarks about “religion” to Mr. Wenner in this interview, note what he was saying on the same subject 18 years ago, just after the release of Slow Train Coming. The interviewer, Bruce Heiman, is trying to get Dylan’s reaction to the atheist activists who are picketing his shows:

Heiman: Well the Atheists are against any sort of religion, be it Christianity ….

Dylan: Well, Christ is no religion. We’re not talking about religion … Jesus Christ is the Way, the Truth and the Life.

[...]

Heiman: OK. They believe that all religion is repressive.

Dylan: Well, religion is repressive to a certain degree. Religion is another form of bondage which man invents to to get himself to God. But that’s why Christ came. Christ didn’t preach religion. He preached the Truth, the Way and the Life. He said He’d come to give life and life more abundantly. He talked about life, not necessarily religion …

[...]

Dylan: Well, a religion which says you have to do certain things to get to God - they’re probably talking about that kind of religion, which is a religion which is by works: you can enter into the Kingdom by what you do, what you wear, what you say, how many times a day you pray, how many good deeds you may do. If that’s what they mean by religion, that type of religion will not get you into the Kingdom, that’s true. However there is a Master Creator, a Supreme Being in the Universe.

Heiman: Alright. In another one of their statements they say that: “For years Dylan cried out against the Masters Of War and the power elite. The new Dylan now proclaims that we must serve a new master, a master whose nebulous origins were ignorance, foolishness, stupidity and blind faith. The Dylan who inspired us to look beyond banal textbooks and accepted ideologies now implores us to turn inwards to the pages of The Holy Bible, a book filled with contradictions, inaccuracies, outrages and absurdities”. Now this is what they’re saying.

Dylan: Well, the Bible says: “The fool has said in his heart, there’s no God … ”

So, I guess it’s not quite “Bob Dylan Like You’ve Never Heard Him Before.”

...................
Share this!
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [StumbleUpon] [Email]

Posts which might be related to this one based on a mysterious algorithm:




There she is … ...9:40 am

We needed this story. Kudos to Allahpundit at Hot Air for picking it out: 82-year-old former Miss America stops thief by shooting his tires out.

Venus Ramey won the Miss America pageant in 1944, representing the District of Columbia. Full story here:

After confronting a man she said was stealing from her Kentucky farm, Ramey pulled out a gun and shot out a tire on his truck so he couldn’t leave, allowing police to arrest him and two others.

“He was probably wetting his pants,” Ramey said Thursday from her home in Waynesburg, about 140 miles south of Cincinnati.

Ramey was on her Lincoln County farm last week - “Friday the 13th, apropos date, isn’t it?” she noted Thursday - feeding a horse when she saw her dog run to a nearby building where she stores old steel-shaping machines, lathes and other equipment.

“This stuff is over 100 years old,” she said.

For some time, thieves had been breaking into the building to steal the machines to sell for scrap. She hadn’t been able to catch anyone in the act until last week.

She drove over to the building and blocked the truck sitting there.

When she asked a man what he was doing, he replied “scrapping,” and said he would leave.

“I said, ‘Oh, no you won’t,’ and I shot their tires so they couldn’t leave,” Ramey said.

She had to balance on her walking stick as she pulled out a snub-nosed .38-caliber handgun.

“I didn’t even think twice. I just went and did it. If they’d even dared come close to me, they’d be 6 feet under by now.”

Ramey then tried to flag down people driving by. When one stopped, she asked them to call 911. Eventually, three people were arrested - one at the scene and two others walking on a nearby road.

“They’ve been stealing from me for years. Those good-for-nothing slobs,” she said.

[...]

Ramey left Cincinnati in 1990 to return to the quiet farm life she loves.

Now, she just wants to be left alone - especially by criminals.

“I’m trying to live a quiet, peaceful life and stay out of trouble, and all it is, is one thing after another.”

Is there an age limit for Miss America? And can you win it twice?

...................
Share this!
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [StumbleUpon] [Email]

Posts which might be related to this one based on a mysterious algorithm:




Thursday, April 19, 2007

Reprise ...7:17 pm

Bob Dylan contracted with XM Satellite Radio for fifty shows last year, and the fiftieth one, entitled “Spring Cleaning,” has aired this week (although yours truly hasn’t heard it in full yet). He is now stepping away from the microphone … but only until September, when he will return with a new series.

When the series first started my initial expectation was that it would run for a few months, followed by a few months of repeats, and then more new shows, and so on. I honestly wouldn’t have expected fifty consecutive new shows, which Dylan delivered along with a new album, and all the while maintaining his intimidating schedule of concert touring.

Having heard the shows, however, it’s no surprise that he is now re-upping for another year. He’s having a ball, as are his listeners. And those of us who foolishly felt we could document the shows in some fashion each week may now have a little time to catch up.

...................
Share this!
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [StumbleUpon] [Email]

Posts which might be related to this one based on a mysterious algorithm:




Wednesday, April 18, 2007

Supremes ...11:55 am

Big news today in the upholding by the U.S. Supreme Court (in a 5-4 decision) of the federal partial-birth abortion ban, but maybe not so big in its real implications at this point. Some good instant analysis is offered at the Scotusblog.

Kennedy wrote the opinion, which is something of a shocker, but he seems to maintain in it that the Court’s existing abortion jurisprudence is not upset by this decision — i.e., that there was room for this narrow ban on one specific procedure. Therefore, no great revolution has taken place. However, I think today’s result does underline the fact that with one more good appointment to the Supreme Court, there likely would be something of a revolution. (Or, more accurately, an undoing of the previous revolution.)

...................
Share this!
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [StumbleUpon] [Email]

Posts which might be related to this one based on a mysterious algorithm:




Tuesday, April 17, 2007

Songs ...8:23 pm

From Uncasville, CT, on November 20th, 2001, here is a sample of Dylan and his band performing his song Mississippi.

Every step of the way we walk the line
Your days are numbered, so are mine
Time is pilin’ up, we struggle and we scrape
We’re all boxed in, nowhere to escape

It’s not the only Dylan song that stands up somehow — that still rings true — even in the worst of times. That quality, which so many of his songs have, is surely one of the defining features of his work. It’s something he no doubt learned in substantial part from the old folk and blues songs which he measured himself against. It has to do with being square and direct (an absence of ironic distance, despite the fact that the singer may be singing in a voice that is anything but his own), and maintaining an awareness of the inevitability of death, instead of maintaining a pretense that it might never come (as so much of pop culture does). It’s also about always keeping a finger on truths and mysteries which are, frankly, Biblical.

Every moment of existence seems like some dirty trick
Happiness can come suddenly and leave just as quick

While the world is asleep
You can look at it and weep
Few things you find are worthwhile
And though I don’t ask for much
No material things to touch
Lord, protect my child

I pity the poor immigrant
Who wishes he would’ve stayed home,
Who uses all his power to do evil
But in the end is always left so alone.
That man whom with his fingers cheats
And who lies with ev’ry breath,
Who passionately hates his life
And likewise, fears his death.

...................
Share this!
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [StumbleUpon] [Email]

Posts which might be related to this one based on a mysterious algorithm:




Sunday, April 15, 2007

Seeing, believing, etc. ...9:19 am

From the King James translation of the Bible, John 20:24-31:

But Thomas, one of the twelve, called Didymus, was not with them when Jesus came.

The other disciples therefore said unto him, We have seen the LORD. But he said unto them, Except I shall see in his hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the print of the nails, and thrust my hand into his side, I will not believe.

And after eight days again his disciples were within, and Thomas with them: then came Jesus, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst, and said, Peace be unto you.

Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing.

And Thomas answered and said unto him, My LORD and my God.

Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.

From Tampa, Florida, on February 2nd, 2002, Bob Dylan and his band kicking off the show with a sterling rendition of I Am The Man, Thomas (a song composed by Ralph Stanley and Larry Sparks).

...................
Share this!
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [StumbleUpon] [Email]

Posts which might be related to this one based on a mysterious algorithm:




Saturday, April 14, 2007

Rising sun ...5:11 pm

At his gig Thursday night in Newcastle, England, Bob Dylan and his band played a version of House of the Rising Sun, which is being seen as a doffing of the hat to the Animals, who came out of Newcastle. Story from a Newcastle paper at this link.

...................
Share this!
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [StumbleUpon] [Email]

Posts which might be related to this one based on a mysterious algorithm:




Imus ...11:11 am

There’s been so much written about the Don Imus story in the past seven days; probably more in total than has been written about all the people murdered during China’s Cultural Revolution, when you think about it. Such is the world we live in. Never having even listened to Imus, I’ve been hesitant to trumpet any particular opinion. However, Rich Lowry’s column today seems to be about the most reasoned overview I’ve read on the subject: Bonfire of Profanities.

The unedifying Imus controversy is almost entirely a liberal conflagration, a perfect bonfire of the profanities: with journalists and politicians caught out ignoring their own standards of political correctness; with left-wing grievance-meisters doing their grim work on the mainstream media’s favorite shock jock; with the culture of victimology running its ritualistic course. Armed only with the dubious loyalty of his frequent guests, Imus didn’t stand a chance.

[...]

Impeccably liberal columnist Tom Oliphant had the misfortune to appear on Imus’ show after the “nappy-headed” comment and before it was clear that Imus was on his way to being expelled from polite company. Oliphant excused the Imus remark as something that “can happen to anybody,” and ended his appearance by saying that regular guests “have a moral obligation to stand up and say to you, ‘Solidarity forever, pal.’ ”

So there you have it: Offensiveness now, offensiveness tomorrow, offensiveness forever. No liberal would make that kind of stand on behalf of anyone else. Imus got an exemption because his guests could feel as though they were part of the in-crowd and that they had done something wild and naughty by parleying with him.

[...]

Imus did the rest of us no favors by trying to find redemption by appearing on Al Sharpton’s radio show, thus helping legitimize Sharpton’s aspiring role as the nation’s offensiveness cop.

That notion is itself offensive, given that he made his chops by falsely accusing an innocent man of rape - something for which he has never apologized - and that his specialty is inflammatory self-aggrandizement.

The Imus saga is another sign of how we’ve degraded the importance of politeness and decorum, and how we try to make up for the loss with political correctness. Imus’ show was always boorish, but that was OK until he offended the wrong people at the wrong time with the wrong term.

A reader also suggests that the Bob Dylan song Who Killed Davey Moore would be a fitting soundtrack to this sordid saga, and I’d say there’s something in that.

...................
Share this!
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [StumbleUpon] [Email]

Posts which might be related to this one based on a mysterious algorithm:




Thursday, April 12, 2007

The reviews are in ...9:38 pm

Bob Dylan’s Spring tour hits an English speaking venue (or Glasgow at least) and the mainstream media reviews come tumbling along.

From The Scotsman:

ANY Bob Dylan show is a clash between exceeded and dashed expectations, but to see the wily old troubadour playing his sunburst Fender Stratocaster centre-stage once more was reward enough for most.

Opener Cat’s in the Well was unremarkable, but the latest arrangement of It Ain’t Me Babe capably evoked the song’s alternate moods of melancholy and injustice, even as it evaded every effort by the crowd to join in.

But not all is positive:

The swinging Summer Days was a tedious contrast, deflating the arena’s atmosphere, but Like a Rolling Stone was a palpable release, the crowd enthused at finally being able to sing along.

Do you see anything wrong with that sentence? “The swinging Summer Days was a tedious contrast …”. It seems odd to call something “swinging” one moment and “tedious” a few syllables later, doesn’t it? It’s true that some people — like some of those who go to multiple Dylan shows per year — are kind of tired of hearing Summer Days at every single gig, but Dylan seems to have worn it as his signature song since 2001, and he shows no sign of giving it up. Why should he? It’s almost like his My Way, except that by all accounts Frank Sinatra didn’t particularly love My Way and it became a burden to him to sing at every gig (he was happy to replace it with New York, New York).

More unrelentingly positive is David Gritten in The Telegraph:

In Bob Dylan’s lilting Spirit on the Water, a song with immense charm, there’s a slightly coy couplet that goes: “You think I’m over the hill/ You think I’m past my prime.” When Dylan sang this lyric to a packed, supportive audience of Glaswegians, they roared their disbelief. And rightly so: Dylan may be in his mid-sixties, but he and a five-man band delivered a blistering two-hour set full of energy and verve.

By now, it’s a given that Dylan will reinterpret a few of his old classics in concert, rendering them unrecognisable except by their lyrics, but here it was notable how many of his most magisterial career-defining songs he chose to recast.

Thus It Ain’t Me Babe was given a shuffling, almost Caribbean rhythm. Just Like Tom Thumb’s Blues received a loping, bluesy treatment. It’s Alright Ma (I’m Only Bleeding) was reimagined as a slab of hard-driving stadium rock.

Nit-pick: Hasn’t Just Like Tom Thumb’s Blues always been a loping, bluesy tune?

The writer wonders why Dylan doesn’t talk more during the shows, but concedes that he’s probably decided that concerts are “not the place for talking.” The review ends on an unambiguously admiring note:

This was a concert that reaffirmed his standing as a dynamic, questing artist, enjoying one of his most creative periods in the fifth decade of an unparallelled career. At the end of Spirit on the Water, he playfully sings: “We can have a whopping good time.” We did.

John Williamson in The Herald was also pleased:

That this is a near-vintage Dylan show - full of unexpected twists and wilful perversity - has much to do with the grace and dexterity of last year’s Modern Times album. Unusually, the set is heavily loaded in favour of recent material, with six of the album’s tracks featuring. The reflective beauty of Ain’t Talkin’ contrasts with the urgency of the band during Spirit on the Water and encore Thunder on the Mountain, but each is a bona fide highlight.

[...]

When tackling his sixties and seventies material, however, Dylan has spent 30-plus years, along with assorted musicians, messing with structures and time signatures. To a certain extent, this continues and even Like a Rolling Stone and All Along the Watchtower are hardly rendered in singalong format. Yet Dylan’s voice (clearer and more inhabited than ever) and new-found dexterity on the organ mean he seems to be having fun with, rather than cannibalising, his past. It makes for a convivial atmosphere and proves, most crucially, that Dylan is still in love with music - and, in his 66th year, reconciling his present with his substantial past achievements.

David Sinclair of The Times, however, remains cool, albeit reasonably appreciative:

He is a legend, a genius, an elder statesman of rock and all the rest of it, but Bob Dylan is not a very rewarding performer. Stuck on a stark, undecorated stage at this vast exhibition centre in Glasgow, he and his backing group lounged around with a minimum of fuss in the distance. There were no screens but Dylan was identifiable as the man in the white hat leaning over a microphone. The others wore black hats.

(That’s a joke. About hats.)

Dylan began with a guitar in his hands, his voice croaky and quavering as he mangled the intricate lyrics of Just Like Tom Thumb´s Blues and It´s Alright, Ma (I´m Only Bleeding) into barely recognisable shapes. The musicians maintained the deceptively casual air of a bar-band, as if playing in front of 10,000 people was really no big deal, and certainly nothing that called for any particular showmanship.

Switching to keyboards, Dylan tackled The Levee´s Gonna Break, a lively jump blues, and When the Deal Goes Down, a waltz-time tune with a wheezy, fairground organ part to accompany his wheezy vocal. Both were songs from his new album, but sounded more ancient than the ark. Dylan stayed put behind the keyboard for the rest of the show, occasionally pulling out a harmonica, but offering little variation in his delivery from one song to another.

Now that we have heard his Theme Time radio programmes, we know what a droll and entertaining communicator Dylan can be. But nothing was volunteered between songs, save for the most perfunctory of introductions to the five band members right at the end.

“You think I´m over the hill/You think I´m past my prime,’ he sang in Spirit on the Water, prompting a rare moment of engagement with the crowd, some of whom yelled their sympathetic disapproval of any such idea. Even so, with the best will in the world, it was hard to equate the spluttering rendition of Like a Rolling Stone with the incisive sneer of the original. They closed the show with a noisy romp through All Along the Watchtower, ending a display of genius that could be described only as deeply erratic, at best.

Well, give the reviewer his due: Dylan shows are generally erratic. He’s always reaching for something, and, inevitably, sometimes the reaching falls a little short. But this is also why it’s worth listening in the first place. When he gets there — when he and band click with a rearranged old standard and take it to heights you didn’t know existed — it’s exhilarating, and it carries the performances that might be less inspiring. As the writer said, it’s “a display of genius” that can be described as “erratic,” but who else wouldn’t give their eyeteeth to be able to display genius — if only erratically — on live stages at more than one hundred concerts per year?

I’m reminded of a genuinely precious quote from Leonard Cohen regarding Bob Dylan. You can find it in an article by Tom Chaffin, at this link.

BACK IN the early ’80s, I was having dinner with poet and singer Leonard Cohen, and we were talking about Bob Dylan. Cohen had had dinner with Dylan a few nights earlier, and we were discussing Dylan’s current slump in popularity.

He had recently embraced evangelical Christianity and produced a series of religious albums that troubled many fans.

Cohen thought the reaction unfair, and was particularly galled by a review blasting Dylan’s album, “Shot of Love,” because it included “only one masterpiece,” which was Dylan’s poignant hymn, “Every Grain of Sand.”

My God! Only one masterpiece,” Cohen exclaimed, as we ate at a restaurant in Montreal. “Does this guy have any idea what it takes to produce a single masterpiece? I think anything he does merits serious attention.”

...................
Share this!
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [StumbleUpon] [Email]

Posts which might be related to this one based on a mysterious algorithm:




Tuesday, April 10, 2007

“Dylan’s shining Revolution” ...12:08 pm

Oh boy. It goes on. It really does. From the Stanford Daily, Queen of Green: Blowin’ in the Wind:

Bob Dylan introduced me to Revolution (with a capital R) in the 6th grade. At the time, I knew about other revolutions — primarily those of the French, Russian and American varieties — but no one had told me about Revolution. The introduction happened when I stole a best-of-Dylan compilation disc from my mother and inserted it into my portable CD player. Although songs such as “Subterranean Homesick Blues’ were nigh incomprehensible to me, it was impossible to miss the fact that Dylan was angry about something; even now, I´m hard-pressed to think of a song more passive-aggressive than “Blowin´ in the Wind.’

I idolized Dylan, partly because I believed him to be dead, and partly because he promised the times were a-changin´, which for an unstylish, acne-laden, puppy-fat-cursed 11-year-old was good news. My blind adoration of Dylan quickly spread to other singer/songwriters of his era, such as Joni Mitchell, Joan Baez, Janis Joplin, etc. In the face of the pre-teen world´s Britney Spears obsession, my musical tastes looked odd, even to my mother, who started questioning me about ‘my music.´

As my mother explained ‘my music´ to me, stories of her youth began to emerge from the marijuana-clouded haze of her past. I had gathered that Dylan was singing about what I called in my mind the Revolution, and the stories coming from the improbable mouth of my bespectacled, polo shirt-clad mother, made the nature of the Revolution clearer. The Revolution hated racism, sexism and the war in Vietnam. The Revolution had sprung from bra-burning, long-haired nymphs such as my mother who had been arrested and been high, but most importantly had been right.

[...]

Dylan´s shining Revolution no longer exists, although I see people, young and old alike, hungering for a return of the Revolutionary glory days. During my freshman year, one of my section leaders in SLE (suspend your jokes just this once, please) frequently dismissed us from section with the half-mocking, half-earnest entreaty, “Alright. Now go rebel.’ I wished I could. I wished I could go fight the good fight, like my mother and Bob Dylan taught me. But perhaps I should have realized that revolution isn´t something learned, but something conjured in desperate times. If I learned revolution from my mother, then perhaps it isn´t revolution at all.

Today´s revolution is a whole different kind of fight, one for which even Dylan couldn´t prepare me. When I look at global warming, my chosen mini-revolution, I realize sadly that idealized arguments won´t get me very far. The answer isn´t blowin´ in the wind; the only things blowin´ in the wind are pollutants, and none of Dylan´s songs offer advice about carbon sequestration. The point is that I — we — all have to wage our mini-revolutions with Dylan´s zeal, but with the understanding that they won´t be half as romantic as Dylan´s songs. Our mini-revolutions largely lack an opposition — unless you count apathy, which is hardly fun to argue against.

[...]

But I digress. What I mean to say is that the situation of the revolution is shitty, but there is a common ground on which all our diverse revolutions stand, and it is this: Our revolutions appeal to a global conscience that is not even close to being fully-formed. If we believe in our revolutions, it will be our job to build that conscience. Although we tiny revolutionaries might feel like complete unknowns, or even rolling stones with no direction home, there´s something to be said for our brand of revolution. It´s new, it´s what our parents´ Revolution brought us to, and most importantly, it´s ours.

(bolding mine)

And there’s really nothing anyone can say.

But let me say this anyway: When I began reading the article, I was prepared to be impressed. Noticing that the writer made a distinction between “Revolution,” capitalized, and mere “revolution,” I was thinking that she was going to talk about some level on which Dylan’s music was revolutionary beyond the usual half-baked sixties-generation clichés. When she wrote about putting on his Greatest Hits album and hearing Subterranean Homesick Blues for the first time — I thought: “Right; that is revolutionary the first time anyone hears it.” It certainly was for me.

However, what she heard was that “Dylan was angry about something.” Her perceptions regarding his music seem to have started from that flawed vantage point, and gone downhill from there. In Subterranean Homesick Blues, I don’t hear what I would describe as “anger” — least of all a politically motivated rage. I hear exhuberance — to a degree that is rarely caught on record — and I hear humor, and I hear a wild expression of freedom (not least artistic freedom). There are knocks at the expectations and strictures of society in the song, to be sure, but there’s no call to overthrow anything. The call — if any — is to see through it and to be able to laugh at it.

Blowin’ in the Wind is described by the writer above as being “passive-aggressive.” I’m not sure what she means by that, but, again, I tend to think she’s imparting a political motive to a song that is above all of that , and is truly timeless. It could be sung in any era or any place, under any political system and under any conditions, and it would still be framing questions to which our souls by their nature demand answers, although those answers will never be provided with finality on this earth.

The writer of the article is clearly young — to have been a pre-teen during the Britney Spears era — and her idealism is to be admired as being superior to apathy. But I do hope she is someone who continues to listen to Dylan, rather than freezing her current impression of him forever, and that she eventually gets down to the deeper things going on in his songs. It might depend on how much time she has to spare with all the work she plans on doing to “build [a] global conscience.”

Oh mercy.

Addendum 10:30 pm: Thanks to Ronnie for the appropos Dylan quote:

“I know Madonna was here a few weeks ago telling everybody to think global - and I know a whole bunch of you are doing that - I want to try and tell you - rethink it!” Bob Dylan at Staples Arena 10-19-2001 during the band intro 5:50 minutes into Leopard Skin Pill Box Hat

...................
Share this!
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [StumbleUpon] [Email]

Posts which might be related to this one based on a mysterious algorithm:




Sunday, April 8, 2007

Easter ...2:30 pm

I think I posted this song before, but this is a different version. The recording has a slightly muffled quality but it’s a dynamite performance: Bob Dylan on piano, duetting with Clydie King, on a Dallas Holm song called Rise Again. It’s from the latter part of 1980; I don’t know exactly which concert.

...................
Share this!
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [StumbleUpon] [Email]

Posts which might be related to this one based on a mysterious algorithm:




Saturday, April 7, 2007

Real live ...3:56 pm

Bob Dylan’s Spring tour of Europe proceeds apace and seems to be getting very good reviews. He continues to play electric guitar on the first several numbers of each show, before switching to the keyboard, which is set to the organ sound. There are some nice new arrangements of old favorites, as usual. No shocking additions to the set list as yet, as compared to the last couple of tours. The good people at Dimeadozen are busy doing the bittorrent thing. Another way to get a sampling of what’s going on is via YouTube, where a search on Bob Dylan 2007 delivers a smattering of amateur concert clips.

...................
Share this!
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [StumbleUpon] [Email]

Posts which might be related to this one based on a mysterious algorithm:



« Previous PageNext Page »

BACK TO MAIN





Original text copyright © 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 by RightWingBob.com
Quotes from the works of others are linked to their source or are as otherwise attributed, and are used in accordance with Fair Use guidelines. Contact: rightwingbob(at)gmail.com

Back To Main


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More


Buy it: Tell Tale Signs: the Bootleg Series Vol. 8

Buy it: Hank Williams: The Unreleased Recordings


Serious Dylan Related Things:

Right Wing Bob On:

Who Am I And What Is This Site About?

Q & A Series

Who's That Girl From The Red River Shore?

What Bob Dylan Said On Election Night In Minnesota

Preserved in Desire

Mister Pitiful

Theme Time Radio Hour(s) with your host Bob Dylan (Dylan's show on XM Satellite Radio)

Argument With A Leftist

God On Our Side

A Christmas Carol

Chronicling Chronicles

Look My Way An' Pump Me a Few (Marcus, Ricks and Wilentz at Columbia University)

John Brown

The Whole Wide World Is Watching

Coming From The Heart

Also see: From the Weekly Standard, What Dylan Is Not

From First Things, The Pope and the Pop Star


Search Right Wing Bob's Back Pages:

Google
Web RightWingBob.com




Recent Posts:


Email:
RightWingBob@gmail.com
(emails may be published)


Bob Dylan Interviews:

1985 20/20 TV Interview

Transcriptions of various Bob Dylan TV interviews



Remnants Of The Recent Past:

  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • · August 2004 thru July 2005