Amazon.com Widgets RightWingBob.com » 2007 » December

 


You are in the RightWingBob.com archive.



RWB does not determine the content of GOOGLE Ads, but does benefit from your click.


RightWingBob.com
Another side of Bob and more!

Well I sat by her side and for a while I tried
To make that girl my wife
She gave me her best advice and she said
Go home and lead a quiet life



 


Friday, December 28, 2007

Happy New Year ...12:16 pm

It’s a somber close to 2007, but then, depending on which way you look, every year end is somber. I guess you just have to (more…)

...................
Share this!
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [StumbleUpon] [Email]

Posts which might be related to this one based on a mysterious algorithm:




Thursday, December 27, 2007

Jesus Camp ...4:58 pm

“Jesus Camp” is a film which has been nominated for an Academy Award, under “Best Documentary Feature.” It will be broadcast on the U.S. cable channel, A&E, on Sunday night. Linda Stasi in the New York Post reviews it, and says, “It’s not anti-Christian. But it’s definitely anti-fanatic.” There’s little question, however, what kind of message Ms. Stasi took from the film.

IMAGINE a place where children paint their faces in camouflage and play warriors for God.

A place where “Harry Potter” is condemned as anti-God warlock worship, and where children lay hands on a cardboard cut-out of the leader of their country to make a spiritual connection.

A place where children are whipped into a religious frenzy nightly until they are in tears and speaking in tongues.

Taliban training camp deep in the mountains of Afghanistan? Close.

Try the “Kids on Fire” Christian summer camp at (I swear!) Devil’s Lake, North Dakota, run by Pentecostal minister Becky Fischer. Yes, folks, this is a camp where Americans send their children for immersion in evangelical Christianity.

I haven’t seen “Jesus Camp,” and, as I don’t pick up the A&E channel from my cave, I don’t expect to see it anytime soon. It’s certainly news to me that a group equivalent to the Taliban is programming children right here in the U.S.A to be suicide bombers, to kill people who follow other religions, to murder homosexuals, to beat women or girls who leave the house uncovered, to … oh, that’s not what they’re doing? Well, I guess the Taliban comparison only goes so far, then.

I realize it’s pretty easy to make fun of the kinds of people who operate and who go to this camp, and who so trustingly allowed these film makers to point cameras in their direction. Christians, as a group, are like any other “group” of millions and indeed billions of people, in that they encompass all types. There are those who are quiet, and those who are gregarious. There are the short and the tall, the thin and the obese. There are geniuses and fools — sometimes both at the same time. There are those with good taste in music and those who like very, very bad music indeed. By virtue of what kind of people they are, and what kinds of preferences they have, they will express their Christianity, likewise, in different ways. To me — and I’m only going by what I’ve gathered about the “Kids on Fire” summer camp from the likes of Linda Stasi and other reviewers — the choices being made by the people who run the camp and the parents who send their kids there are fundamentally ones that have to do with taste. For instance, I think that George W. Bush is a decent man doing an incredibly difficult job, and he deserves and needs our prayers, and I would surely see fit to tell my children that. I just wouldn’t utilize a cardboard cut-out of him in the process. But making fun of people for doing so is just that — making fun — unless you can demonstrate some genuine harm that is coming to anybody as a result.

The parents of these kids doubtless see a popular culture that hungrily waits to devour their children and fights against most every precious Christian belief they would like to impart to them, and sending them to this camp for a few weeks is their idea of pushing back at it. Linda Stasi and other mocking observers might see no problem, I suppose, with a culture that pushes mindless materialism, loveless sex, atheistic philosophies of life and so on, and which the average child is subjected to year round, but they have a problem with a few weeks one summer which are spent having their parents’ Christian ideas reinforced. There’s apparently a problem — to refer specifically to what this reviewer cited — with kids being told that abortion is not a good thing, that militant Islam is a growing danger, that the President of the United States needs prayers to do the right thing, and that one should put one’s faith not in the occult but instead in Jesus Christ. Well, I don’t have a problem with any of those things. I surely think it is a parent’s right to communicate their own view of those issues to their children, and it is a question of judgment as to the best way of doing so. I might well not judge that this kind of summer camp is the way to do it, but I’m not going to condemn those who do, let alone compare them to hate-filled murderers like the Taliban.

One thing is sure: the weeks spent at this camp will fade into memory, but the popular culture will persist. TV, peers, school teachers and later college professors — all will play a role in teaching these kids that anything they were told at “Jesus Camp” was hogwash. Most of them will shake it off, and indeed laugh at it, and that will be their right. Some may realize, however, that just because the way they were taught certain things in that camp appears, with hindsight, rather ridiculous, it nonetheless does not follow that what was being taught was without fundamental value or truth.

...................
Share this!
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [StumbleUpon] [Email]

Posts which might be related to this one based on a mysterious algorithm:




Monday, December 24, 2007

Merry Christmas ...3:55 pm

I’ve ruminated before about Bob Dylan and the song Rock of Ages. Well, now I’m happy to say that there is a clip on YouTube of Dylan and the boys performing it on November 17th, 1999, in Durham, New Hampshire. (Click here to go to YouTube or play below.)

The tune features no shepherds or falling snow, but in its way it’s as relevant a song at Christmas as any other I could think of.

As the year draws towards a close, thanks to all readers of this space for taking the time to stop by, for feedback, and for all forms of support. It’s all deeply appreciated.

For the New Year, I had planned some expansion of the RWB media empire — I was going to purchase the Los Angeles Times, and a local television station or two, and really shake things up. However, looking at the ol’ credit card bill just now, I realize this scheme will have to be scaled back just a tad. Maybe we’ll have to make do with my intention to ramp up the Q&A feature with new and exciting content in the coming weeks.

On his “Theme Time Radio Hour” Christmas show in 2006, which is being reprised this year by XM Satellite Radio, Bob Dylan read the poem Christmas Bells by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow. It’s a poem that was written during the U.S. Civil War, and after a period of great personal tragedy for Longfellow (see “The Story Behind”).

May those bells, literally or figuratively, be pealing loud and deep wherever you are this Christmas.

Christmas Bells

“I heard the bells on Christmas Day
Their old familiar carols play,
And wild and sweet
The words repeat
Of peace on earth, good-will to men!

And thought how, as the day had come,
The belfries of all Christendom
Had rolled along
The unbroken song
Of peace on earth, good-will to men!

Till, ringing, singing on its way,
The world revolved from night to day,
A voice, a chime
A chant sublime
Of peace on earth, good-will to men!

Then from each black accursed mouth
The cannon thundered in the South,
And with the sound
The carols drowned
Of peace on earth, good-will to men!

It was as if an earthquake rent
The hearth-stones of a continent,
And made forlorn
The households born
Of peace on earth, good-will to men!

And in despair I bowed my head;
“There is no peace on earth,” I said;
“For hate is strong,
And mocks the song
Of peace on earth, good-will to men!”

Then pealed the bells more loud and deep:
“God is not dead; nor doth he sleep!
The Wrong shall fail,
The Right prevail,
With peace on earth, good-will to men!”

...................
Share this!
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [StumbleUpon] [Email]

Posts which might be related to this one based on a mysterious algorithm:




Sunday, December 23, 2007

Follow that star ...1:43 pm

There’s a really wonderful performance of Shooting Star that’s just recently been uploaded to YouTube, apparently from a 1998 gig. Dylan’s singing here is just terrific, and the two guitar solos he takes also reflect his complete absorption in the song. Click here to go directly to YouTube or play below.

For someone who so often dazzles with words and images, Shooting Star is, I think, an example of how Dylan can sometimes tango dangerously with cliché and yet ultimately wring multi-layered meaning out of those well-worn phrases. And this performance illustrates just how central to that magic is the way in which the words are sung.

Seen a shooting star tonight
Slip Away.
Tomorrow will be another day.
Guess it’s too late to say the things to you
That you needed to hear me say.
Seen a shooting star tonight
Slip away.

...................
Share this!
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [StumbleUpon] [Email]

Posts which might be related to this one based on a mysterious algorithm:




Saturday, December 22, 2007

How smart we are ...5:43 pm

From the BBC is a story on new research uncovering surprising things about the power and capabilities that may be present in a single brain cell.

There could be enough computing ability in just one brain cell to allow humans and animals to feel, a study suggests.

The brain has 100 billion neurons but scientists had thought they needed to join forces in larger networks to produce thoughts and sensations.

The Dutch and German study, published in Nature, found that stimulating just one rat neuron could deliver the sensation of touch.

One UK expert said this was the first time this had been measured in mammals.

The complexity of the human brain and how it stores countless thoughts, sensations and memories are still not fully understood.

Not fully understood. No kidding. Yet, somehow, some scientists and doctors seem to have little hesitation in making bland pronouncements as to a given human being’s brain function, as if it’s all as open and shut as a case of appendicitis. Someone once said that there are both known unknowns and unknown unknowns. The latter kind will get you every time.



Addendum:
Thanks much to Hugh for the following:

Here is a quote from a book called “Shuffle Brain” [by Paul Pietsch] now on the Internet
http://www.indiana.edu/~pietsch/shufflebrain-book10.html

You probably know this, but anyway, a paramecium is a single celled animal that
swims around. I used to watch them under the microscope when I was a kid.

“Evidence of memory on single-celled animals dates back at least to 1911, to
experiments of the protozoologists L. M. Day and M. Bentley on paramecia.[3]
Day and Bentley put a paramecium into a snug capillary tube–one whose diameter
less than the animal’s length. The paramecium swam down to the opposite end of
the tube, where it attempted to turn abound. But in the cramped lumen, the
little fellow twisted, curled, ducked, bobbed….but somehow managed by
accident to get faced in the opposite direction. What did it do? It immediately
swam to the other end and got itself stuck again. And again it twisted, curled,
ducked…and only managing to get turned around by pure luck. Then, after a
while Day and Bentley began to notice something. The animal was taking less and
less time to complete the course. It was becoming more and more efficient at the
tricky turn-around maneuver. Eventually, it learned to execute the move on the
first attempt.”

If I recall all this book says, it is that brains are not so important. People
with progressive adult hydroencephalopathy may have close to 100 percent of the
gray matter in their brain destroyed, yet still function as professors, bank
managers etc. (Sir John Lorber discovered this).

This is important in one area. Many say that a fetus cannot have consciousness.
If a paramecium, which is only one cell, can exhibit memory and problem-solving
(you will find more at the link), then all the more …..

...................
Share this!
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [StumbleUpon] [Email]

Posts which might be related to this one based on a mysterious algorithm:




Friday, December 21, 2007

Jingle Bingle Swingle ...5:08 pm

You might think Christmas tunes couldn’t get any plainer than Bing Crosby singing Jingle Bells, but there’s nothing more swinging than the version he did with the Andrews Sisters in the 1940s. Click here to go to YouTube (audio with stills) or play below.

...................
Share this!
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [StumbleUpon] [Email]

Posts which might be related to this one based on a mysterious algorithm:




Freddy or not ...2:07 pm

It’s just time. RWB is endorsing Fred Dalton Thompson for the Republican nomination.

As mentioned when I meditated on the horse race nine days ago, Fred Thompson is the candidate whose views, as articulated by him, are closest to my own. I like that about him. Despite that, he is human, and there are reservations I’ve had about him, and about every candidate, that have kept me comfortably on the fence until now. But time’s a wastin’, and there comes a point you either make your choice or have it made for you. So I’m making mine now. I could have waited till after Christmas, but I figure there’s a lot of work to be done by Fred’s campaign in making up all those banners and stickers (Endorsed by RWB!) to plaster on his bus and to festoon each public event from here on out. Get busy, you guys.

Those hesitating to support Thompson may be doing so for a few reasons. What’s his executive experience? It is not extensive, to be sure, but the fact that he hasn’t presided over a huge bureaucracy in the past does not by definition mean that he won’t be effective at it — merely that we don’t know for sure what his talents in that area will prove to be. And the Democrat he would face in the general election will not have any more executive experience than him (unless Governor Bill Richardson stages an unlikely rally). In the end, for me, it comes back to what the candidate’s beliefs are, and what that candidate would actually be likely to do with the executive power.

Another reservation some conservatives may have is that he’s not pro-life enough, because he doesn’t back the idea of a constitutional amendment protecting life in the womb, and because he’s indicated that he would leave the abortion issue to the states, were Roe v. Wade to be overturned. I’m not sure how many real people have this reservation, since Thompson has picked up so many endorsements from pro-life groups, but it may well be out there. All I would say to this is: nuts. Pro-life people who are thinking two or three steps ahead of the overturning of Roe v. Wade should beware the possibility that twenty years from now it still won’t be overturned. Its overturning is the crucial thing for people who want to be able to see just the beginning of a reversal of the tide of abortion. On this issue of issues, Thompson is solid and has long been solid, and there is every reason to have confidence that it would figure prominently in his thinking in appointing judges to the federal bench. He is also a Second Amendment absolutist, and, bluntly, the same judges who are likely to find an explicit individual right to bear firearms in the U.S. Constitution (because it’s there in the text) are also likely not to find an explicit right to have an abortion (because it’s not there in the text).

I could go on (I could mention his unique willingness among the leading candidates to be seen as a skeptic of man-made global warming) but, after all, I’m not being paid to do this. It’s still his campaign to run and to win. There are signs that his timing may be well-judged and that he may be able to pull off some surprises in the next month or so, and so I hereby give him this invaluable endorsement as an early Christmas present, and I’ve also sent him a few bucks via the internets to pay for hamburgers on the road.

There are certainly other very good candidates on the Republican side, and today’s not the day for me to knock any of them. But the lay of the land is clear enough now that I think I know which way I’d prefer to see the Republican party, and ultimately the country, go.

I’ve said until now, “may the best man win,” but today it is my candid opinion that Fred D. Thompson is the best man.

...................
Share this!
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [StumbleUpon] [Email]

Posts which might be related to this one based on a mysterious algorithm:




Thursday, December 20, 2007

Cold enough for ya? ...1:25 pm

For a lot of people these days, the effective answer to the usually rhetorical question above appears to be, “No — I’d like it to be colder, thank you very much.”

This is a point the absurdity of which is very well illustrated in David Deming’s column from yesterday’s Washington Times, “Year of global cooling.”

Along with detailing examples of damaging and record-setting cold weather which has hit various places across the world during 2007, from South America to Korea, he writes the following about sunny Kaleefawnya and some other spots in the U.S.:

Last January, $1.42 billion worth of California produce was lost to a devastating five-day freeze. Thousands of agricultural employees were thrown out of work. At the supermarket, citrus prices soared. In the wake of the freeze, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger asked President Bush to issue a disaster declaration for affected counties. A few months earlier, Mr. Schwarzenegger had enthusiastically signed the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, a law designed to cool the climate. California Sen. Barbara Boxer continues to push for similar legislation in the U.S. Senate.

In April, a killing freeze destroyed 95 percent of South Carolina’s peach crop, and 90 percent of North Carolina’s apple harvest. At Charlotte, N.C., a record low temperature of 21 degrees Fahrenheit on April 8 was the coldest ever recorded for April, breaking a record set in 1923. On June 8, Denver recorded a new low of 31 degrees Fahrenheit. Denver’s temperature records extend back to 1872.

Again: one and a half billion dollars worth of damage is done to crops in California by extreme cold, and meanwhile the governor of that state moves full steam ahead on measures which — if they were to achieve ultimate success — would encourage more such freezes. That is the reality, after all. If you want to fight temperature increases, then you by definition either want the average temperature to remain the same or to decrease. As much as man-made global warming skeptics and deniers (like yours-truly) think that the idea of being able to cool the planet through carbon taxes and such is vain, reckless and ridiculous, that is its goal, i.e., to prevent the climate from getting any warmer, and presumably to actually cool it from where it is now, in order to counteract the already-awful effects on polar bears and the like that we are constantly being bombarded with in the media.

It is a bizarre state of affairs when political leaders are basing policies that will affect millions not on the evidence that is in front of their eyes but on unproven scientific theories instead.

Pursuant to that, you also might want to browse this U.S. Senate report (from the minority side, of-course) which details over 400 scientists who have raised questions to one degree or another about the supposedly indisputable prevailing wisdom of man-made global warming.

Meanwhile, it will soon be time to start hoarding incandescent light bulbs, and/or planning on how to deal with the hazardous waste that compact fluorescent bulbs (CFLs) generate in your house when you accidentally break them. The passage of the new energy conservation bill reminds me on a certain level of the “immigration reform” episode earlier this year. Congress, and the President, thought they could just come to an agreement on immigration and seal it all up before the unwashed masses got to chime in, and they very nearly succeeded. In this case, they did succeed. Did anyone ask you or me if we want to switch over the lighting in our residences to all fluorescent bulbs, all the time? What do you think the average Joe would say to that? I mean, there are reasons we’re not doing it already, reasons that have to do with our preferences. I’ve tried CFLs, and haven’t liked them enough to switch over. Well, forget about what I like, obviously. Thou shalt use fluorescent light, saith the government, and that is that. Just wait until — God forbid — we have an administration in Washington that is truly gung-ho on this climate change malarkey. Just considering the possibilities ought to be truly disturbing.

...................
Share this!
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [StumbleUpon] [Email]

Posts which might be related to this one based on a mysterious algorithm:




Wednesday, December 19, 2007

New Year in the Highlands ...10:43 am

Where better to sing Auld Lang Syne than in the bonnie Scotland of that lyric’s author, Robert Burns? And if you believe the press reports, that’s where Bob Dylan will be this New Year’s Eve.

Should auld acquaintance be forgot,
and never brought to mind ?
Should auld acquaintance be forgot,
and auld lang syne ?

For auld lang syne, my dear,
for auld lang syne,
we’ll take a cup o’ kindness yet,
for auld lang syne.

My heart’s in the Highlands at the break of dawn
By the beautiful lake of the Black Swan
Big white clouds, like chariots that swing down low
Well my heart’s in the Highlands
Only place left to go

...................
Share this!
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [StumbleUpon] [Email]

Posts which might be related to this one based on a mysterious algorithm:



Next Page »

BACK TO MAIN





Original text copyright © 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 by RightWingBob.com
Quotes from the works of others are linked to their source or are as otherwise attributed, and are used in accordance with Fair Use guidelines. Contact: rightwingbob(at)gmail.com

Back To Main


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More








Serious Dylan Related Things:

Right Wing Bob On:

Who Am I And What Is This Site About?

Q & A Series

Preserved in Desire

Mister Pitiful

Theme Time Radio Hour(s) with your host Bob Dylan (Dylan's show on XM Satellite Radio)

Argument With A Leftist

God On Our Side

A Christmas Carol

Chronicling Chronicles

Look My Way An' Pump Me a Few (Marcus, Ricks and Wilentz at Columbia University)

John Brown

The Whole Wide World Is Watching

Coming From The Heart

Also see: From the Weekly Standard, What Dylan Is Not

From First Things, The Pope and the Pop Star


Search Right Wing Bob's Back Pages:

Google
Web RightWingBob.com




Recent Posts:


Email:
RightWingBob@gmail.com
(emails may be published)


Bob Dylan Interviews:

1985 20/20 TV Interview

Transcriptions of various Bob Dylan TV interviews



Remnants Of The Recent Past:

  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • · August 2004 thru July 2005